MonitorControl vs Stats
A data comparison of two system utilities for macOS. Figures come from Homebrew metadata and 30-day install analytics; this page does not contain subjective reviews.
Bottom line: Choose Stats for a larger user base (12,239 vs 3,390 installs in 30 days), which usually means more tutorials and faster answers.
| MonitorControl | Stats | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | GUI app | GUI app |
| Category | System & Utilities | System & Utilities |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Licence | Not declared | Not declared |
| Apple silicon | Universal | Universal |
| Latest version | 4.4.0 | 3.0.23 |
| Dependencies | 0 | 0 |
| Installs (30 days) | 3,390 | 12,239 |
| Install command | brew install --cask monitorcontrol | brew install --cask stats |
Which one should you install?
- Choose Stats for a larger user base (12,239 vs 3,390 installs in 30 days), which usually means more tutorials and faster answers.
Install either with one command:
How to read this comparison
Only published Homebrew facts are compared: package type, category, licence, architecture, version, dependency count and 30-day install volume. A larger install count means more people install the app through Homebrew; it is not a quality score. Data updated 2026-10-26.